![]() ![]() The first approach to Omnifocus may be a little confusing: the interface is packed with stuff, the toolbar is populated by tons of icons and it’s menus, menus, menus everywhere. Omnifocus offers all of these features and so much more. For those who still don’t know what Getting Things Done is (and perhaps have lived under a giant rock for the past 5 years), it’s a method created by David Allen which lets you add tasks, process them, review them, complete them and archive them. It offers so many features, possibilities and ways to get things done that it’s easy to get lost at first, but if you just give it the benefit of the doubt and delve deeper into the system, you’ll realize that maybe you haven’t really tried the GTD method at all before. Omnifocus is one of those applications you can mold into your own app. Turns out Sync is only one of the features that made me switch, as I found way more than simple over the air sync in Omnifocus. So I decided to try Omnifocus again, and here we are today. And if you’re a Things user, you should know that’s not possible, though Cultured Code promises it will come soon with an update. Indeed, I came to a point where I needed to sync my Things database between the Mac and the iPhone not only within my local network, I desperately needed to access my tasks while on the go. It doesn’t get almost anything wrong in any section, it could be the perfect GTD application, but – sadly – it’s not. I went for Things, as you may have read in my review some weeks ago. Many people suggested Omnifocus from the Omnigroup, and many told me to give a spin to Things, the new kid on the block from CulturedCode, which featured a clean design and a very streamlined interface. I remember when I started using my Mac in a professional context, I went around asking for “the best application” to manage tasks on a Mac. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |